1
No votes without a pipeline to shipping
A vote is a work order, not a data point. Every FeatQ board comes with an endpoint your coding agent reads directly, so the ranked queue feeds the thing that writes the code.
A manifesto
FeatQ exists to connect the vote to the code. Your users vote. Your agent ships it.
You have seen one. A public feedback board where the top request has hundreds of votes and a status that says "Open." It has said "Open" for years. Below it, dozens more requests, thousands of votes between them, all waiting. The board is still collecting. It just stopped shipping.
This is not a lazy-team problem. It is a plumbing problem. Feedback tools were built to collect and rank, and they do that fine. But nothing connects the vote to the code. The board and the codebase are two separate worlds, and every request has to be hand-carried between them by whoever has time. Usually, nobody has time.
So the board becomes a write-only database. Users notice. The people who took the time to vote watch their request age for a year, stop voting, and quietly stop believing anything you say about your roadmap. A graveyard does not just bury requests. It buries trust.
What we hold to
1
A vote is a work order, not a data point. Every FeatQ board comes with an endpoint your coding agent reads directly, so the ranked queue feeds the thing that writes the code.
2
A "Planned" label that never moves is worse than silence. On FeatQ, statuses change because work happened: your agent pulls a request, ships it, and marks it done.
3
Collecting feedback was never the hard part. The loop only closes when the request ships, the changelog updates, and the people who voted hear about it.
The alternative
Every FeatQ board is readable by your coding agent over MCP, the open protocol that lets agents like Claude Code and Cursor use outside tools. The vote does not sit in a queue waiting for someone to copy it out. The agent pulls it.
Vote
Users vote on what to build next
Pull
Your agent pulls the top-ranked request
Spec
The request becomes a build-ready spec
Ship
Your agent implements and ships it
Changelog
Voters get the update automatically
The changelog closes the loop: when a request ships, voters who opted in get an email, and the board shows the receipt.
Receipts
We audited public feedback boards and measured how long top-voted requests sit open. These numbers come straight from the dataset: read the full audit.
29
public feedback boards audited
4.4 years
median age of top-voted requests still open
73,021
votes sitting on requests that have not shipped (plus 39,288 GitHub reactions, counted separately)
Data collected July 20, 2026. Raw dataset: check our work.
A hosted voting board your coding agent works from, at a flat price per board.
14-day money-back guarantee. Cancel anytime.
And one footnote: no per-user fees, ever. One flat price per board, and each board has room for ten thousand voters. Charging by the head was never the point.