A manifesto

Feedback boards became graveyards. Votes go in. Nothing comes out.

FeatQ exists to connect the vote to the code. Your users vote. Your agent ships it.

The vote graveyard

You have seen one. A public feedback board where the top request has hundreds of votes and a status that says "Open." It has said "Open" for years. Below it, dozens more requests, thousands of votes between them, all waiting. The board is still collecting. It just stopped shipping.

This is not a lazy-team problem. It is a plumbing problem. Feedback tools were built to collect and rank, and they do that fine. But nothing connects the vote to the code. The board and the codebase are two separate worlds, and every request has to be hand-carried between them by whoever has time. Usually, nobody has time.

So the board becomes a write-only database. Users notice. The people who took the time to vote watch their request age for a year, stop voting, and quietly stop believing anything you say about your roadmap. A graveyard does not just bury requests. It buries trust.

What we hold to

Three no-graveyard principles

1

No votes without a pipeline to shipping

A vote is a work order, not a data point. Every FeatQ board comes with an endpoint your coding agent reads directly, so the ranked queue feeds the thing that writes the code.

2

No status theater

A "Planned" label that never moves is worse than silence. On FeatQ, statuses change because work happened: your agent pulls a request, ships it, and marks it done.

3

No board that ends at the vote

Collecting feedback was never the hard part. The loop only closes when the request ships, the changelog updates, and the people who voted hear about it.

The alternative

A loop instead of a graveyard

Every FeatQ board is readable by your coding agent over MCP, the open protocol that lets agents like Claude Code and Cursor use outside tools. The vote does not sit in a queue waiting for someone to copy it out. The agent pulls it.

Vote

Users vote on what to build next

Pull

Your agent pulls the top-ranked request

Spec

The request becomes a build-ready spec

Ship

Your agent implements and ships it

Changelog

Voters get the update automatically

The changelog closes the loop: when a request ships, voters who opted in get an email, and the board shows the receipt.

Receipts

The graveyard is measurable

We audited public feedback boards and measured how long top-voted requests sit open. These numbers come straight from the dataset: read the full audit.

29

public feedback boards audited

4.4 years

median age of top-voted requests still open

73,021

votes sitting on requests that have not shipped (plus 39,288 GitHub reactions, counted separately)

Data collected July 20, 2026. Raw dataset: check our work.

Start a board that ships.

A hosted voting board your coding agent works from, at a flat price per board.

14-day money-back guarantee. Cancel anytime.

And one footnote: no per-user fees, ever. One flat price per board, and each board has room for ten thousand voters. Charging by the head was never the point.